Archive for July, 2007

Leapfish? Okaaaaay….

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Sorry, I know I’ve been a bit Larry Kingish in my quick, semi-insubstantial bulletins lately, but it’s been very busy at work. I’ll have something for you guys soon.

In the meantime, I just found out about LeapFish, a site that appraises the value of your domain name.

According to them, artfulwriter.com is worth…

…drumroll….

$26,796.00!!!!

Awesome! I am totally selling this place and buying a Buick LaCrosse!

As a point of comparison, yahoo.com appraises at $1,523,846,985.

I have some work to do…

Strange Russian Cola Ad

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Just say no to the evils of Western colas and the music of KISS.

Runtime: 30 sec

I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Harry

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Should it be any surprise that "I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry" was the biggest-grossing movie of the weekend, with a $35 million that beat out "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" ($32 million its second weekend out) and "Hairspray" (28 million)? Not really. The combined Q score for Adam Sandler and Kevin James renders the movie a genuine mass-appeal prospect. More to the point, all the Harry Potter maniacs A) had already seen "Phoenix" -- twice -- and B) spent Friday camped out in front of a bookstore (probably in Harvard Square, from the mob reports I've heard) and the weekend with their noses glued to "Deathly Hallows." So they were down for the count.

And "Hairspray"? Don't cry for it, America. Largest opening ever for a musical, even accounting for ticket inflation (although, as Box Office Mojo points out, studios routinely open their films in many more theaters than in decades past). Rave reviews helped convince multiplex audiences to get past their fears of musicals, although some folks apparently have deeper issues. My Idiot Email of the Week was this one:

"Are you gay, Ty? Is there a musical you didn't LOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVE? Give a good review to an action flick and prove your manhood. Otherwise, you can pick up your fairy wings on the corner of Boylston and Tremont with the rest of the freaks."

To which I say: Grow some stones, chump, and enjoy song-and-dance like the rest of us. Gene Kelly was a bigger jock than you or I will ever be.

In limited release, Danny Boyle's sci-fi stunner "Sunshine" played in only 10 theaters but picked up a massive $23,500 per theater.

More box office numbers at Box Office Mojo and via Leonard Klady.

The Nines goes to Venice

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

A reader alluded to it in the comments of an earlier post, but today we can officially announce that The Nines was chosen to play the Venice Film Festival as part of Critics’ Week.

(At least, I assume we can announce it. We were sworn to double-super secrecy, which is presumably now over, since it was in Variety this morning.)

Critics’ Week runs the first week of September; our exact slot should be announced today or tomorrow. Coincidentally — but fortuitously — our U.S. premiere is August 31st, so it will be a busy couple of weeks of promotion.1

We’re the only U.S. feature in Critics’ Week this year, which traditionally aims for a wide spectrum of international releases. The other films in our category hail from Mexico, France, Kazakhstan, Russia, Italy, Belgium, and Taiwan.2

How psyched am I to be going to Venice? Ohsovery. I didn’t travel to Cannes when The Nines screened there, but that was really just European market screenings for distributors. This is the international debut. I can’t wait to have awkward conversations about the meaning of the film in broken English while jetlagged. And mildly drunk on Italian wines chosen for their melodic names.

Briefly, since I know these will be the first questions raised in the comments section:

  • The trailer is done, and should be up within the week.
  • The trailer competition is happening, but had to be back-burnered while other stuff got finished.
  • No, I don’t know when we’ll be playing in Omaha. Or if we’ll be playing in Omaha.
  • Ditto for Argentina.
  • I’ve seen the international one-sheet, but the U.S. poster is still in discussions.
  • We’re rated R. Presumably for language.
  • The official website is getting rebuilt on more-robust servers.
  • The movie is unchanged from what premiered at Sundance.
  • The movie will be on 35mm in some theatres, digital in others. I’ve seen both projected. They’re different, but equally valid. I’ve considered doing a post about this process, but it would be Geek Factor 8.
  • I have no idea when the DVD would come out, but they’re already working on the special features.

  1. We’ll be launching in New York and Los Angeles, and maybe one other city. How quickly we expand to other cities depends on how well we perform in our first two weeks.
  2. You can see the Italian film listing for The Nines (’I Nove’) at the SNCCI website. If any ambitious readers feel like translating, have at it. I just like the adjective “lynchiano” — “Lynch-ian.”)

Amazing First Date

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

This woman has amazing, talented, breasts.

Runtime: 59 sec

Breakdancing for Beer

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

One guy with crazy legs turns into the pied piper of breakdancing.

Runtime: 1 min 7 sec

Maggie Gyllenhaal Trash Talks Katie Holmes

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Filed under: , , , , ,

As J. Peterman once said, "I am smack dab in the middle of a good old-fashioned cat fight!" While recently discussing her role in next year's Bat-sequel The Dark Knight, Maggie Gyllenhaal dunked Katie Holmes into a Dawson's Creek of verbal abuse. Gyllenhaal is taking over the role of Rachel Dawes, which Holmes originated in 2005's Batman Begins. Check out this quote from Gyllenhaal, but you might want to put a jacket on first: "I'm not thinking of it as a role that anyone's played before. I'm not walking into Katie Holmes' performance. I'm thinking of it as an opportunity to play somebody who's alive and smart. Chris (Nolan) asked me to do this because he wanted me, not because he wants some generic lady in a dress." Daaaaaamn! No she didn't!

I'm not sure Holmes really deserves any more negativity at this point. She's in a mercilessly mocked marriage that no one seems to take seriously, she's got a new baby, and she hasn't exactly been adored by the critics. Holmes certainly gave a pretty weak performance in Batman Begins, but let's give the gal a break here, no? What do you guys think about this, is Gyllenhaal being too harsh on Holmes? In the interview, Gyllenhaal also mentions that she might give the Jackie Chan thing a try in the film: "I'm really excited about it. I mean, it's not some silly action movie. Chris Nolan is directing, Christian Bale's starring. I'm really excited and curious about doing a couple of stunts in Batman." Why do all "serious actors" feel they have to justify being in action movies? They always have to point out how different and superior this one is to all the others, or its "I'm only doing this crap so I can finance my pet project -- a tone poem about migrant Chinese workers." You want to do an action movie, silly or otherwise, do it! We don't need to hear that you'd normally be above such frivolous projects.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Ronaldo and the Bull

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Ronaldo does his signature fancy footwork, but this time in the matador arena.

Runtime: 45 sec

Hold the Presses! Or, the New York Times on How Nikki Blonsky Dares to Eat (Gasp) Ribs!

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Filed under: , , , ,

Over at Hollywood Elsewhere (a frequent site of heated debates on issues like homosexuality and fatness versus thin-ness) Jeff Wells really pushed some buttons with a post about this New York Times piece on Hairspray star Nikki Blonsky by Monica Corcoran (note: login with a free account required to read it) in which Ms. Corcoran makes observations like, "To see Ms. Blonsky caper through "Hairspray," the musical adaptation of the John Waters camp classic, is to watch a Botero come to life as she wiggles her broad backside and flaps her ample arms." and "When plates of ribs and roast chicken arrived, she dug in with gusto." Golly gee, with those ample arms flapping in the breeze, however did she manage to even hold onto that plate of ribs, much less sign autographs for fans?

Wells doesn't actually weigh in (yeah, pun intended) with an opinion on Blonsky's proportions, but boy, oh, boy do his commenters get into it. This isn't the first time Wells and his readers have gotten into it on the issue of weight, but I find it interesting nonetheless that people are going after Blonsky for her weight (and I love all the concern about the poor girl's health) -- after all, the role of Tracy Turnblad calls for a "fat girl" -- that's kind of the whole point of the story, right? I mean, seriously ... imagine, if you will, if Adam Shankman had cast uber-skinny Keira Knightley as Tracy, and stuck her in a fat suit like they did with John Travolta in the film. Plenty of people are peeved also at the casting of Travolta in a fat suit instead of a real woman of larger proportions playing that role, by the by, even if the casting is a sort of homage to Harvey Fierstein and Divine.

I've not seen Hairspray yet, but by all the accounts I've read of the film, Blonsky's performance is pretty darn good -- how about discussing how she compares to Ricki Lake, or to any of the actresses who played Tracy on stage? Here's what I predict: Within a couple years, Blonsky's agent and PR people are going to convince her that she has to lose weight in order to continue having a career (after all, there are only so many roles for fat girls out there, right?) and we'll see a miraculous transformation ala Ricki Lake -- I can see the tabloid headlines now: "Former Fatty Nikki Blonsky: How I Stopped Eating Ribs With Gusto and Shed 50 Pounds!" Then she can start hanging out with Paris Hilton, get drunk at nightclubs, flash her crotch getting out of limos, and end up in rehab. Maybe then people will talk about her talent, and not her weight.
Permalink | Email this | Comments

Another WriterAction Update…

Sunday, July 22nd, 2007

Clifford Green, one of the founding admins of WriterAction, has also resigned. What’s interesting about his resignation is the fact that he specifically chalks it up to not being able to work with Alex Sokoloff anymore.

And boy…do I ever understand that feeling.

I don’t doubt that my little cyberscreed precipitated his and Brian’s actions, although I also don’t doubt that this was a long time coming, and Clifford’s specific beefs probably don’t mirror mine. I don’t take any credit for his choices. I probably just served as an enzyme here.

Nonetheless, something’s happening behind the curtain at WA.

I can’t tell if all I’ve done is start a process where the well-intentioned admins up and quit in disgust with the institutional paranoia and reflexive defensiveness (that would be bad), or if these recent defections might open the admins’ minds to the notion that they step down and let other people be given a turn at the helm (that would be good).

Time will tell.

In the meanwhile…man, Lord Acton nailed it, didn’t he…?