Running downtown this morning, I saw a woman speaking to a couple of good-looking young men outside the subway entrance. The closer I got the clearer it was to see that she was upset. The two men backed away and into the station. "This city is not your ashtray," she screamed after them. She was on a bicycle. She wore expesive jeans. She didn't seem especially crazy or particularly Cantabrigian. What she wanted, I think, is what anybody who loves her city wants: an end to litterers. Although, I'd settle for ones as handsome as Toronto's. This city is one worth defending against gum wrappers and cigarette butts. In 2010, can anyone get elected on that platform? Can a Canadian?
Archive for September, 2010
Toronto 2010: Condos, Kidman, etc.
Wednesday, September 15th, 2010Toronto 2010: Werner Herzog in 3D
Tuesday, September 14th, 2010
Never Let Me Go (2010)
Monday, September 13th, 2010Have you seen the 2005 Michael Bay film, The Island? That bloated and overbearing film was constantly in the back of my head as I was watching Never Let Me Go. The premise similarities are striking, as is the fact that the film (The Island) and the book (“Never Let Me Go”) came out around the same time. However, the film itself was purported to be a rip off of Michael Marshall Smith’s 1996 book “Spares” and Philip K. Dick’s 1964 novel “The Penultimate Truth,” so I guess the concept isn’t all that new. That “Never” is in the same vein as the rest of these works is not a spoiler, nor did the filmmakers want it to be. I was fortunate enough to catch an interview with the writer of the novel, Kazuo Ishiguro, together with screenplay writer Alex Garland. Alex clearly stated that the story they wanted to tell was a personal one and they did not want to be coy and keep anything a secret. In fact, there is a scene about 20 minutes in where someone, subtly but without question, spills the beans. The story of this dystopian world, a place that would allow this type of thing to happen, is just the backdrop and not the story that they wanted to tell. The morals and ramifications of such decisions are not discussed, so just because the storyteller does not want to share the answers does not mean that the audience won’t be asking, and be hounded by the questions.
In his novel “Never Let Me Go,” Kazuo Ishiguro (also the writer of “The Remains of the Day”) created a story of love, loss and hidden truths. In it he posed the fundamental question: What makes us human? Kathy (Carey Mulligan from An Education), Tommy (Andrew Garfield – The Social Network) and Ruth (Keira Knightley – those Pirate films) live in a world and a time that feels familiar to us, but is not quite like anything we know. They spend their childhood at Hailsham, a seemingly idyllic English boarding school. When they leave the shelter of the school, and the terrible truth of their fate is revealed to them, they must also confront the deep feelings of love, jealousy and betrayal that pull them apart.
To return to my previous point, this is a very British film. Where The Island is full of huge passions, big explosions and all the delicacy of a flying brick, Never Let Me Go is filled with people and pauses that are pregnant with repressed and subdued emotions. The comedian Eddie Izzard put it best here. That was one of the things that kept me at such a distance from the characters in this film. These people in this film underwent some very traumatic and emotional experiences and they go through it as calm as Buddhist monks. It wasn’t until near the end that someone has a genuine and well-needed outburst. Until that happened, I hadn’t realized how much of the characters’ unexpressed emotions were building up within me and how much I was waiting for that release, waiting for someone to be…well…human.
The other thing that kept me at a distance was what I brought up in the first paragraph. I can respect that the filmmakers did not want to focus on the sci-fi aspects, but by ignoring the new world they are building, they may just as well not have made it to begin with. People are completely and fundamentally selfish. Things need to be taken from people by force. Even by having the main trio of friends discuss or witness some sort of rebellion would have been plenty, just so we know that it exists and what happens to those who try. Without it though, I was constantly asking myself why these people were willingly going along with their unjust fates. However, listening to the writers after the screening, they brought up a great point. The slaves in America did not become free because they rebelled, but because those who enslaved them decided not to do so anymore. The Jews did not stop their own genocide because they rose up against their oppressors but because the Allies occupied Europe. Ishiguro stated in the interview, “people are remarkably accepting of their fate.” It seems a truthful, if cynical, worldview to say that people just don’t escape.
The standouts for this film were the trio of main actors as well as the three children who played their counterparts at a younger age. Izzy Meikle-Small, Ella Purnell and Charlie Rowe play Carey Mulligan, Keira Knightley and Andrew Garfield respectively during their time at Hailsham. For being so young, all three of them brought a great deal of depth and heart to their roles and I will be looking out for all three of them to see what they do with their talent. Keira Knightley has always been an enigma for me on screen. She never really seems to buy into any role she’s playing and it feels like she just goes along with the motions and says the words given her. In this film, especially in certain scenes, she rose slightly from that opinion although it was almost cruel to cast her next to Carey Mulligan. Carey is quickly becoming one of my favorite actresses because she imbues all her characters with such pathos; she is electric. As far as Andrew Garfield goes, his character in this film was a bit of a spaz and bordered on being slightly mentally challenged. I don’t know if that was by writer’s design or by actor’s choice but I wasn’t really digging it. That said, Garfield is a force to be reckoned with. He is going to be Spiderman, for Pete’s sake. All six of these performances are the reason to see this film. It is a tour de force from all actors involved; I just wish the story would have let me get closer to them.
Claude Chabrol: 1930 – 2010 (Just After Nightfall)
Monday, September 13th, 2010Not that he was ever compared unfavorably with his Nouvelle Vague brethren, but the late Claude Chabrol (left, in 1979 with actress Bernadette Lafont and his wife Stephane Audran) was considered the steadiest, least flashy of the bunch, with the faint whiff of patronization that implies. Where Godard was off manning the barricades of art, politics, and cinema, and Truffaut was reliving his youth and obsessing about women, and Rohmer was dissecting emotion in great arias of chatter, and the mysterious Rivette was fashioning marathon exercises in paranoia and the creative process, Chabrol was -- well, he was making dramatic thrillers. Where's the ambition in that?
In the craft, bien sur, and in the slow accretion of damning social portraiture that stretches from his first film, 1958's "Le Beau Serge", pretty much to the end (2007's penultimate "A Girl Cut in Two"). On the surface, Chabrol's visual style was polite, discreet, and occasionally glacial, but if you looked closer, you saw that every camera move was a scalpel wielded by a master surgeon who could fillet bourgeois pretension and reveal the beast within the civilized man. Chabrol wasn't a moralist or a cynic -- instead, he was torn between cool amusement and muted horror at the ways in which the human animal mistreats his own kind. If he had a kindred filmmaking spirit, it was probably Luis Bunuel, but whereas the great Spaniard eviscerated his targets with love and surrealism, Chabrol hung back and let his chic, murderous characters hang themselves.
Will You Give ‘Devil’ A Chance Despite the M. Night Shyamalan Connection? (Poll)
Monday, September 13th, 2010Filed under: Drama, Horror, Thrillers, New Releases, Universal, Celebrities and Controversy, Polls, Movie News, New Releases, Cinematical

If your name is Guillermo del Toro or Steven Spielberg, acting as an "executive producer" on a small film or even just somehow being associated with it gives it a type of credence and name recognition that no ad dollars can buy. Would 'The Orphanage' have gotten any traction without del Toro's name attached? Maybe not, and that would be a pity because it's a damn fine little ghost story. Of course, this can totally work against the film if it's someone like, oh, M. Night Shyamalan.
If you went to see 'Scott Pilgrim vs. The World,' you probably also saw the trailer for 'Devil,' which is "From the Mind of M. Night Shyamalan." Chances are, you also heard the infamous boos that accompanied this message. Never mind that 'Devil's connections to Shyamalan are only that he came up with the story and that he's a producer; marketing 'Devil' with his name might be the kiss of death. People were pretty worked up about 'The Last Airbender' and its casting process, and he didn't do a really great job of defending 'The Last Airbender' against charges of racism. Others just think his career going down the toilet. Plenty of pixels have been spent arguing about M. Night Shyamalan.
Far less have been about 'Devil.' Is it simply because Shyamalan is associated, or because the trailer just isn't appealing? Even the trailer that showed up on YouTube (and has since been removed) was filled with anti-Shyamalan comments. As Erik Childress wrote, "The filmmaker once ridiculously dubbed the next Spielberg now instantly taints anything he comes in contact with as reactions to the 'Devil' trailer show."
Are you going to see 'Devil' despite M. Night Shyamalan's admittedly small role in its development? Do you think its association with him has tainted it? Or are you going to go and find out which of these people are THE DEVIL?!
Toronto 2010: Mixed nuts
Monday, September 13th, 2010
If these aren't outright perilous times for American movies, they are a little worrying, especially if you're an Oscar voter. How on earth does anyone expect to get to 10 best-picture nominees without subtitles? This festival is, among many other things, about getting tomorrow's Academy Award nominees positioned today. Some of the loudest noise has been for "The King's Speech," which is English and features Geoffrey Rush curing the stutter of king-to-be Colin Firth. I missed the one press screening, but like many of these award-season bellwether movies, it will be upon us soon enough.
On the American front, the last couple of days have turned up few signs of life. One of the alleged bright spots was one lots of other critics and I missed. A last-last minute screening of Clint Eastwood's supernatural drama, "Hereafter," was arranged the other day then poorly attended. But two very different people who were there said they were amazed. Oh, well. If only I could report the same about Eastwood's fellow movie-star director, Robert Redford, who has a new film at the festival, "The Conspirator."
Set in the hours before and months after Abraham Lincoln's assassination, the movie rather baldly tries to connect the state of divisiveness that gripped the country in 1865 to the divisiveness of 2010. Specifically, it's about the military tribunal of Mary Surratt (Robin Wright, no longer "Penn"), a Confederate supporter who ran the boarding house where Lincoln's assassins planned their attacks.
The film uses all of today's language about political moderation versus various sorts of extremism. Surratt's lawyer (James McAvoy) is a Union war hero who's skeptical about his client's innocence: How could she not have known what was going on under her own roof?
The movie is angry and obvious. Redford has been righteous before, although never more effectively than in 1994's "Quiz Show," which made its political points while telling a very good story with intelligence, wit, and drama. The political climate must be sapping Redford of his dramatic strength. His moviemaking is flat-footed and hollow now. It lacks the thunder, lightning, and comedy that he's capable of.

For sheer humorlessness, though, Redford may never top "Lions for Lambs," his Hollywood tract about our current wars. But this feels even more like a petition, full of good actors (Kevin Kline, Tom Wilkinson, Colm Meany, Danny Huston, Evan Rachel Wood) who, because of the film's tedious allegorical nature, have very little acting to do. Wright has aged into one of our best actresses, but great parts continue to elude her. She's good here but is forced to share her performance with the movie's Grand Themes. They're not terribly persuasive or rousing. All the hair, British Southern accents, and tobacco-colored tinting make so much of the movie feels like a reenactment of a commercial for Civil War encyclopedias.
"The Conspirator" at least has moments that stir the intellect. Mitch Glazer's "Passion Play" has moments that stir only your stomach. Its badness is difficult to overstate. This is a movie that says, "You know what? I have the money to hire Mickey Rourke to play a washed-up saxophonist and Bill Murray to be a New Mexico gangster. I have the cash to have them fight over Megan Fox, who I'll make an angel -- not one of those Victoria's Secret angels, but, like, the real thing, like at a carnival freak show. What I don't have the budget for is effects that make the wings seem real. I know they look like cartoons, but who cares? I paid Mickey to make love to Megan. I know she can't act and that her character doesn't know how to fly. But she doesn't have to: She just has to stand in that glass box with an arm draped over her breasts. That's sure to get me European distribution."
Errol Morris is responsible for one of the festival's best movies. "Tabloid" is Morris in a frivolous mood. The subject of his documentary is Joyce McKinney, a former beauty queen and nude model who sits before the director's patented cameras, looks right at us, and proceeds to reveal why she might be one of the planet's most entertainingly weird people.

In the mid 1970s, McKinney became a sensational staple in the British press after flying to London and kidnapping her boyfriend, a Utah Mormon on a mission. Perhaps you recall the Manacled Mormon case. This is a true feat of tone. Morris's applies a high glaze of amusement to his characteristic thriller instincts. Some of the movie's comedy stems from the way it contrasts McKinney's version of what happened with both how it was portrayed in the press and the way some of the participants remember it. The object of her obsession was, as she put it, in a cult.
Most of the rest comes from McKinney herself (that's her, above, holding one of the movie's more alarming developments). She wears pageant blue and speaks with an unbridled Southern accent. Her breathlessly florid descriptions of the greatest, most eternal love sounds like the passions of a woman in the cult of Harlequin romance. I'm not qualified to diagnose her, but she seems like a grade-A narcissist. No other perception of reality exists but hers. The sex scandal, as it turns out, is but one of several events that kept her . What we don't learn from McKinney is how she truly feels about her odd and sad life. That's a matter for our perception. One person's nadir is another's apex.
Sofia Coppola’s Venice Win for ‘Somewhere’ Causes Controversy
Monday, September 13th, 2010Filed under: Drama, Awards, Celebrities and Controversy, Quentin Tarantino, Awards, Cinematical

Somewhere, Coppola's drama starring Stephen Dorff as an actor spiraling into despair, received such a tepid critical response that it's been written off as a potential awards contender, though Dorff received good notices for his work. (It's due out in theaters on December 22.) Balada Triste de Trompeta won screenplay and director prizes for Spanish director de la Iglesia, though an informal critics' poll ranked it just 17th out of 24 films in competition. Hellman's latest, Road to Nowhere, also failed to impress local critics, though his award was a lifetime achievement prize.
Tarantino, who hugged Coppola on stage after the award was announced, claims he wasn't influenced by relationships and denies that he forced the jury to go along with him: "I was just going to literally respond to the film." He added: "There was no me steering any directions. Sofia doesn't know any of these other people on the jury and her prize was unanimous."
Continue Reading
Box Office top 10
Monday, September 13th, 2010-
A journalism student and her boyfriend try to navigate the pitfalls of a bi-coastal romance.
# -
Alice (Milla Jovovich) and her companions head to a rumored safe haven in Los Angeles.
#
Original: Movies.com Top 10 Box Office
Bollywood’s Secret Underground Sex Operation Revealed
Sunday, September 12th, 2010Filed under: Foreign Language, Celebrities and Controversy, Newsstand, Movie News, Cinematical

Two actresses, Saira Banu and Jyoti, were arrested on August 23rd after an early morning raid of a brothel in the Hyderabad area -- further adding to the persistent rumor that India's leading ladies can be had if the price is right.
To be fair, neither actress is a Bollywood starlet -- both have worked in the smaller Tollywood region -- nor were they working on a street corner in a bad part of town. The area the actresses were arrested in is a high price neighborhood that houses government ministers, IT executives, and other well to do citizens. Still, both were arrested for taking part in what local authorities like to call "the flesh business."
As an article at Will Barnes Online mentions, this isn't the first time this happened. The real questions are why and are India's movie starlets really for sale?
Hit the jump for some possible answers and explanations.
Continue Reading
Toronto 2010: Making love to Ben Affleck
Friday, September 10th, 2010
Ben Affleck is here with the entire cast of "The Town," a heist movie he shot in Boston, America's new favorite most dangerous and most dangerously accented city. This afternoon he held a press conference for the movie. Most of the cast was there. So was Chuck Hogan who wrote the book. It was a standard international festival press conference. The actors -- Chris Cooper, Blake Lively, Jeremy Renner, Rebecca Hall, and Jon Hamm -- sat and watched the director handle most of the queries. In this case, Affleck is a director who acts, so his animated responses didn't put everyone to sleep. He didn't get the best questions, but he made the most of what he had. Here, he talks about sex scenes with Lively and Hall.